Read the source material carefully before answering Question 1. Source material: Will Germany continue to be a strong economy? Population fact file 2017 Germany world population 81 million 7.5 billion percentage of population aged over 65 22.0% 8.5% average age 47.4 years 30.6 years Germany is a country with a trade surplus and a high GDP per head. It also has a budget surplus (government tax revenue greater than expenditure), a high HDI and a low inflation rate. In recent years, German firms have exported a higher value of goods and services. This has contributed to the growth of world trade, caused partly by a fall in transport costs. A relatively large number of German firms produce both in Germany and in other countries, helped by better communications. Germany is a major producer and exporter of luxury cars. Demand for luxury cars was influenced in 2018 by increases in incomes in Germany and abroad, a rise in the price of US luxury cars and, in some countries, a fall in the price of petrol. Improvements in the quality of education and information on job vacancies have made it easier for workers to change jobs in Germany. This greater ability to change jobs has helped to reduce unemployment and to increase the country’s output. Fewer workers in the German car industry are now members of a trade union. As shown in Table 1.1, trade union membership in Germany has declined in recent years. Table 1.1 selected data on the German labour market 2013–2016 Year Trade union membership (millions) Size of labour force (millions) Unemployment rate (%) Average annual wage ($) 2013 18.0 42.2 5.4 40 567 2014 17.7 42.5 5.1 41 188 2015 17.6 42.8 4.8 42 084 2016 17.0 43.3 4.3 42 708 A challenge facing Germany is its ageing population. The effect of an older labour force is uncertain. It may mean firms become reluctant to invest in new technology, but a shortage of young workers may encourage firms to buy more capital goods. Germany’s population may fall and there will soon be fewer Germans aged under 30 than over 60 unless immigration continues at a relatively high rate. Immigration might increase both the country’s labour force and its government’s spending on education. Answer all parts of Question 1. Refer to the source material in your answers. 1 (a) Calculate the number of Germans aged over 65 in 2017. [1] (b) Identify two measures of living standards. [2] (c) Explain one cause of globalisation. [2] (d) Explain two advantages of an increase in the occupational mobility of labour. [4] (e) Analyse why the price of German luxury cars may have increased in 2018. [4] (f) Analyse whether the strength of German trade unions increased from 2013–2016. [5] (g) Discuss whether or not an ageing labour force will reduce productivity. [6] (h) Discuss whether or not immigration will increase a country’s budget surplus. [6]

1(a) Calculate the number of Germans aged over 65 in 2017. 17.82m / 17 820 000 (1). 1 Accept 17.8 m and 18 m. 1(b) Identify two measures of living standards. Two from: • GDP per head / average income • HDI • quality of education / education 2 If more than two are given, consider the first two. 1(c) Explain one cause of globalisation. Fall in transport costs (1) reducing costs of exporting and importing / increasing international trade (1). Improvement in communications (1) due to advances in technology / increasing growth in MNCs / encouraging consumers to buy from other countries / enabling branches in different countries to keep in touch (1). 2 One mark for the cause identified and one mark for the explanation. 1(d) Explain two advantages of an increase in the occupational mobility of labour. Logical explanation which might include: Lower unemployment / increase employment (1) workers losing one job will find another job more quickly / find another job more easily / maybe more skilled / reduce frictional unemployment / reduce structural unemployment (1). Higher output / higher GDP / economic growth (1) firms experiencing higher demand will be able to expand more quickly / more elastic supply / quicker adjustment to changes in market conditions / workers may be able to multitask / change roles / may be more skilled / fewer unfilled vacancies / greater use of resources / fewer idle resources (1). 4 One mark each for each of two advantages identified and one mark each for each of two explanations. Do not credit ‘more skilled’ more than once. 1(e) Analyse why the price of German luxury cars may have increased in 2018. Coherent analysis which might include: Increase in demand (1) rise in incomes (1) people buy more luxury cars as they get richer / luxury cars become more affordable (1). rise in price of US luxury cars (1) these are substitutes to German luxury cars (1). Fall in the price of petrol / gas (1) petrol / gas is a complement to cars (1) firms can raise revenue / profits by increasing price (1). Decrease in supply (1) rise in wages (1) increasing costs of production (1). 4 1(f) Analyse whether the strength of German trade unions increased from 2013–2016. Coherent analysis which might include: Overview Trade union membership fell (1) unemployment fell and / or wages rose (1). Analysis of why trade union strength may have fallen Trade union members represented a smaller proportion of labour force / proportion fell from 42.7% to 39.3% / number of members fell by approx. 5.6% (1). Fewer members so funds of / subscriptions to trade unions may have fallen (1) reduces ability to take industrial action / reduces collective bargaining strength (1). Lower unemployment / higher wages may mean workers feel less need to join a union (1). Analysis of why trade union strength may have increased Lower unemployment / higher wages may be the result of successful collective bargaining (1) firms would have found it more difficult to replace members asking for better wages / better working conditions / firms may be reluctant to dismiss staff (1) industrial action would have more effect / collective bargaining power may be stronger (1). Output / profits / demand for products may have increased (1) Comments. Other factors may have influenced trade union power e.g. government trade union legislation (1). Other factors may have influenced wages / unemployment e.g. national minimum wage / higher output /more skilled labour force (1). 5 1(g) Discuss whether or not an ageing labour force will reduce productivity. Award up to 4 marks for why it might: • May discourage investment (1) workers will have less capital equipment to work with (1). • Older workers may find it more difficult to adapt to new technology (1) may resist change (1) there may not be the time to train them (1) may be less mobile (1). • Older workers may be less fit (1) less able to do manual work (1) may have time off sick (1) may have less energy / get tired (1) work slower (1). Award up to 4 marks for why it might not: • May encourage investment because of shortage of workers / desire to rely less on labour / help workers (1). • Older workers may have more experience (1) built up more skills / qualifications (1) may need less training / have received more training (1) may train young workers (1) make fewer mistakes / produce better quality output (1). • May be more reliable (1) e.g. better punctuality (1). • May stay with the employer longer / lower rate of labour turnover (1). 6 Apply this example to all questions with the command word DISCUSS (1g, 1h, 2d, 3d, 4d and 5d) Each point may be credited only once, on either side of an argument, but separate development as to how/why the outcome may differ is rewarded. Generic example Tax revenue may decrease… 1 ...because of reason e.g. incomes may be lower. 1 Tax revenue may increase because incomes may be higher i.e. reverse of a previous argument. 0 Tax revenue may increase because of a different reason i.e. not the reverse of a previous argument e.g. government spending on subsidies may stimulate the economy more than spending on education. 1 1(h) Discuss whether or not immigration will increase a country’s budget surplus. Award up to 4 marks for reasons why it might: • May increase size of the labour force (1) quality of the labour force may rise (1) employment may rise (1) more people with incomes (1) higher tax revenue (1) more income tax / direct tax revenue (1) more spending / higher total demand (1) more indirect tax revenue (1) higher profits may increase corporate tax revenue (1). Award up to 4 marks for reasons why it might not: • Some immigrants may be dependents (1) some may be unemployed (1) increase government spending on state benefits / unemployment benefits (1) pensions (1). • The government may have to spend more on education (1) healthcare (1) housing / infrastructure (1). • Labour force / population may not increase if matched by emigration (1), • Larger population size may result in the government having to spend more on measures to reduce pollution (1). 6 Increase in the size of the labour force linked to why it might.

Read the source material carefully before answering Question 1. Source material: changes in the Nigerian economy Nigeria fact file 2017 Government spending $19.5bn Tax revenue $12.9bn Balance of trade in goods $10.4bn Imports of goods $32.7bn Nigeria produces a range of products including delivery vehicles, footwear, machines, maize and office equipment. It does, however, depend heavily on oil for its exports. The government tries to encourage an increase in the output and export of other products. To achieve this, it uses a range of policy measures including changes in taxation and government spending e.g. subsidising the training of construction workers. Successful training can increase job opportunities and wages. The government’s aims are to improve Nigeria’s macroeconomic performance and to raise living standards. Table 1.1 shows data on living standards in Nigeria and Ethiopia in 2017. Table 1.1 Selected data on living standards in Nigeria and Ethiopia in 2017 Country GDP per head ($) Life expectancy at birth (years) Average years spent at school % of children aged under 5 who are underweight Nigeria 5,900 59 9 31.5 Ethiopia 2,200 63 8 23.6 Investment in Nigeria has been growing slowly. Some firms are discouraged from spending on capital goods by the relatively high interest rate, high corporation tax rate and economic uncertainty. Nigeria’s population is increasing rapidly. The birth rate is high and the death rate is falling but it has net emigration. Nigeria’s population was 191 million in 2017 and is forecast to grow to 402 million by 2050. An increase in its population size will create both challenges and opportunities. It will affect the level of demand in the economy, may harm the environment and more food will be needed. The Nigerian government increased the tariff on imported rice in 2016, to encourage an increase in its own rice production. Nigeria is Africa’s largest producer of rice but also its largest importer. In 2018, Nigeria imported almost 50% of the rice it consumed. Nigerian farmers produce less rice for every unit of land used than Asian farmers and Nigerian farmers have high costs of production. Answer all parts to Question 1. Refer to the source material in your answers. 1 (a) Calculate the value of Nigeria’s exports of goods in 2017. [1] (b) Identify two examples of capital goods. [2] (c) Explain whether Nigeria had a budget deficit or a budget surplus in 2017. [2] (d) Explain how government spending on training may increase tax revenue in the long run. [4] (e) Analyse how living standards in Nigeria compare with living standards in Ethiopia in 2017. [4] (f) Analyse how a government could encourage firms to increase their investment. [5] (g) Discuss whether or not an increase in Nigeria’s population will benefit its economy. [6] (h) Discuss whether or not an increase in Nigeria’s import tariff on rice would increase the output of Nigerian rice. [6]

1(a) Calculate the value of Nigeria’s exports of goods in 2017. $43.1bn 1 $ is not essential. 1(b) Identify two examples of capital goods. Two from: • [delivery] vehicles • machines • [office] equipment 2 1(c) Explain whether Nigeria had a budget deficit or a budget surplus in 2017. • budget deficit (1) • government spending exceeded tax revenue (1) • government spending was $19.5bn and tax revenue was $12.9bn (1) 2 1(d) Explain how government spending on training may increase tax revenue in the long run. Logical explanation which might include: • Training may increase skills of workers (1) raise productivity (1) raise wages / incomes (1) increase job opportunities / employment / reduce unemployment (1) increase income tax revenue (1). • Higher wages may increase spending / demand (1) increase indirect tax revenue (1). • A more productive labour force may reduce costs of production (1) raise profits (1) increase corporation tax revenue (1). 4 1(e) Analyse how living standards in Nigeria compare with the living standards in Ethiopia in 2017. Coherent analysis which might include: • Nigeria’s higher GDP per head (income) (1) suggests Nigerians may have been able to enjoy more goods and services (1). • Nigeria has a lower life expectancy (1) suggesting poorer healthcare (1). • Nigeria has a higher average number of years spent at school (1) suggesting the labour force may be more educated (1). • Nigeria has a higher percentage of underweight five-year olds (1) suggesting poor nutrition / income inequality (1). • Overall comment: Nigeria’s income per head and average years spent at school suggests a higher living standard but life expectancy and percentage of five years underweight suggests a lower living standard (1). 4 1(f) Analyse how a government could encourage firms to increase their investment. Coherent analysis which might include: • Reduce the rate of interest (1) making it cheaper to borrow (1) encouraging borrowing as consumer spending is likely to rise (1). • Lower corporation tax (1) increasing the funds available to invest (1) increasing the incentive to invest as return from investment would rise (1). • Create greater economic certainty / confidence (1) by e.g. keeping inflation low and stable / not changing government spending and taxation frequently (1) making it easier for firms to plan / it can take time to get a return from investment (1). • Provide subsidies/grants/loans (1) decreasing cost of investments (1) encouraging MNCs (1). • Raise tariffs (1) increasing demand for home produced goods (1). • Less government regulation/policies (1) reduces costs for firms (1) more willing to invest (1). 5 1(g) Discuss whether or not an increase in Nigeria’s population will benefit its economy. Award up to 4 marks for why it might: • Fall in death rate (1) may indicate improved healthcare (1). • Total (aggregate) demand will increase (1) may enable existing firms to expand / increase output (1) new firms to set up (1) attract MNCs (1). • Labour force may increase (1) causing total (aggregate) supply to increase / raise productive capacity (1) increase output / GDP (1). • May move country towards optimum population (1) if there are unused resources (1). • Net immigration will increase labour force (1) and reduce dependency ratio (1) • More tax revenue (1) can be spent on improving e.g., public services (1). Award up to 4 marks for why it might not: • Birth rate is rising (1) will increase dependency (1) resources which may have increased economic growth may have to be devoted to rearing the children (1). • Labour force may fall in the short run (1) to look after the children (1). • Pressure will be put on the environment (1) there may be more pollution (1) causing overcrowding / poor health (1). • If food output cannot be increased (1) may be more malnourishment/famine / poverty (1) more food is required / food may have to be imported (1) food prices may increase (1). 6 Apply this example to all questions with the command word DISCUSS (1(g), 1(h), 2(d), 3(d), 4(d) and 5(d)) Each point may be credited only once, on either side of an argument, but separate development as to how/why the outcome may differ is rewarded. Generic example Tax revenue may decrease… 1 ...because of reason e.g. incomes may be lower. 1 Tax revenue may increase because incomes may be higher i.e. reverse of a previous argument. 0 Tax revenue may increase because of a different reason i.e. not the reverse of a previous argument e.g. government spending on subsidies may stimulate the economy more than spending on education. 1 1(g) • Population is rising but age structure may be changing (1) as there is net emigration of young people (1) may result in reduction in labour force (1). • [Opportunity] cost for government (1) which has to spend on health/education rather than infrastructure (1). • Increase in output to meet demand (1) results in faster usage of resources in country (1) and shortages (1). 1(h) Discuss whether or not an increase in Nigeria’s import tariff on rice would increase the output of Nigerian rice. Award up to 4 marks for why it might: • A higher tariff may raise the price of imported rice (1) may reduce demand for / consumption of imported rice (1) may cause Nigerians to demand more home- produced rice as it is cheaper (1) effect would be greater, the greater the elasticity of demand for the import of rice (1) may enable Nigerian rice farmers to raise their price / make more profit (1). • A tariff may raise government tax revenue (1) some of this could be used to subsidise Nigerian rice farmers / modernise farming methods and so raise productivity (1). Award up to 4 marks for why it might not: • Nigerian farmers are less productive than Asian competitors (1) have high(er) costs of production (1) Nigerian price may still be higher even with the higher import tariff (1). • The supply of Nigerian rice may be price-inelastic (1) so even if Nigerian farmers could sell their rice for more, they may have difficulties adjusting supply (1). • More Nigerian rice will not be sold if quality is poor (1) consumers my prefer the varieties of rice produced in other countries (1) other countries retaliate by imposing higher tariffs (1) current account surplus may be reduced (1). • Increase in import tariffs may be small (1) making little difference to import prices and consumption (1). • Not enough resources/ factors of production e.g., farmers (1) to produce more rice in Nigeria (1). 6

Read the source material carefully before answering Question 1. Source material: Chilean cherries Producing just a few products can be risky for a country. Fig. 1.1 Population pyramids of Chile and Haiti 2018 Content removed due to copyright restrictions. Content removed due to copyright restrictions. There is, however, evidence of market failure and inequality in how resources are allocated. Answer all parts of Question 1. Refer to the source material in your answers. 1 (a) Calculate Chile’s agricultural output in 2017. [1] (b) Identify two disadvantages of a country specialising. [2] (c) Explain one reason why demand for cherries is price-elastic. [2] (d) Explain how Chile’s population structure differs from Haiti’s population structure. [4] (e) Analyse why China buys most of its cherries from Chile. [4] (f) Analyse why Chilean astronomers are paid more than Chilean farm workers. [5] (g) Discuss whether or not Chilean consumers would benefit from more government intervention in the economy. [6] (h) Discuss whether or not the Haitian economy would benefit from fewer of its people working in Chile. [6] Content removed due to copyright restrictions.

1(a) Calculate Chile’s agricultural output in 2017. $11.76bn / $11 760 000 000 / $11 760m (1). 1 Accept $11.8bn and $12bn. $ is not essential. 1(b) Identify two disadvantages of a country specialising. Two from: • demand may fall / new competitors may appear • supply/output may fall / diseases / natural disasters / bad weather may affect agricultural output / costs may rise • non-renewable resources may run out • structural unemployment may occur • reliance on imports no longer produced by home country / overdependency on other countries 2 One mark each for each of two disadvantages. Rely on a small number of industries is not sufficient. 1(c) Explain one reason why demand for cherries is price-elastic. A luxury product (1) they do not have to be purchased / not essential / not a necessity (1). Has close substitutes (1) example / rise in price will cause some people to switch to rival products (1). 2 In terms of close substitutes, also accept: fall in price will cause some people to switch towards this product and away from rival products. One mark for the reason identified and one mark for the explanation. A candidate who writes a luxury product and has close substitutes and no more has identified two reasons, so just one mark. If a candidate identifies one of the two reasons but does not explain it and then identifies the second reason and explains it, the second reason can be taken and with the explanation, 2 marks. 1(d) Explain how Chile’s population structure differs from Haiti’s population structure. Logical explanation which might include: Chile has a higher proportion of its population aged over 65 / Haiti a lower proportion aged over 65 (1). Chile has a lower proportion of the population aged under 15 / Haiti has a higher proportion aged under 15 (1). Chile is likely to have a lower birth rate / Haiti is likely to have a higher birth rate (1). Chile likely to have a lower death rate / Haiti is likely to have a higher death rate (1). Chile’s population pyramid indicates a relatively high level of development/high income country / Haiti’s population pyramid indicates a relatively low level of development/low income country (1). Chile’s population pyramid is less pyramid shaped / more stationary / constrictive / bulges out in the middle / more egg-shaped / Haiti’s is more pyramid shaped / more expansive (1). Lower dependency ratio in Chile / higher dependency ratio in Haiti (1). Higher proportion of population of working age in Chile / lower proportion of population of working age in Haiti (1). Higher population size in Chile / lower population size in Haiti (1). 4 Accept for the first and second points other relevant age ranges e.g. over 60, under 10. Accept longer life expectancy for lower death rate and shorter life expectancy for higher death rate. Note that each country overall has more females than males, so not a difference. 1(d) Chile has a higher average age / older population / Haiti has a lower average age population / younger population (1). 1(e) Analyse why China buys most of its cherries from Chile. Coherent analysis which might include: Chile has high production standards (1) cherries are likely to be of a high quality (1). China does not impose tariffs on Chilean cherries (1) may keep their price low (1). 4 Free trade agreement on its own is not sufficient. 1(f) Analyse why Chilean astronomers are paid more than Chilean farm workers. Coherent analysis which might include: Most astronomers have a university degree (1) high cost of training/ long period of training (1) well qualified / well educated / high level of knowledge (1) highly productive / highly skilled / efficient (1) in short supply (1) high demand (1) more inelastic demand (1) more inelastic supply (1). Most work in the public sector (1) government may be more willing / able to pay higher wages (1) public sector workers are more likely to belong to a trade union (1) have stronger bargaining power (1). 5 Also accept an approach based on an analysis of why Chilean farm workers are paid less than Chilean astronomers. This may include reference to immigrant farm workers who may be prepared to accept relatively low wages and Chilean farm workers being replaced by capital equipment / more replaceable than astronomers. 1(g) Discuss whether or not Chilean consumers would benefit from more government intervention in the economy. Award up to 4 marks for why they might: • evidence of market failure (1) • merit goods may be underproduced (1) as under- consumed (1) • demerit goods may be overproduced (1) as overconsumed (1) • external costs could be reduced (1) external benefits may be increased (1) external costs / external benefits are not taken into account by the private sector (1) • public goods may not be produced (1) no profit incentive to make them (1) as there can be free riders (1) • inequality (1) poor consumers may lose out / there may be poverty (1) resources may not be devoted to producing what the poor need (1) may not be able to afford prices charged (1) • government subsidies (1) can lower prices (1) • government could set maximum prices (1) lower prices of necessities (1) • government could control (private sector) monopoly power (1) prevent abuse of market power (1) • government investment in education (1) could lower prices / raise quality of output (1). Award up to 4 marks for why they might not: • government failure may occur (1) e.g. government may lack information (1). • market forces can provide wide choice of products (1) may be consumer sovereignty (1) 6 Apply this example to all questions with the command word DISCUSS (1(g), 1(h), 2(d), 3(d), 4(d) and 5(d)) Not taking lower taxes, lower subsidies or reduced immigration controls as a form of government intervention. Each point may be credited only once, on either side of an argument, but separate development as to how/why the outcome may differ is rewarded. Generic example Tax revenue may decrease … 1 ... because of reason e.g. incomes may be lower. 1 Tax revenue may increase because incomes may be higher i.e. reverse of a previous argument. 0 Tax revenue may increase because of a different reason i.e. not the reverse of a previous argument e.g. government spending on subsidies may stimulate the economy more than spending on education. 1 1(g) • profit incentive (1) industries may respond to changes in consumer demand (1) • efficient industries (1) prices may be low (1) quality may be high (1) • government intervention in the form of nationalisation (1) may reduce competition (1). • government taxes / tariffs / regulation / minimum wages (1) may increase costs (1) raise prices (1) • maximum prices could reduce availability of products (1) • government limits on immigration (1) may reduce availability of products / raise prices (1) 1(h) Discuss whether or not the Haitian economy would benefit from fewer of its people working in Chile. Award up to 4 marks for why it might: • wages may be low in Chile (1) work involves unskilled labour (1) • employment may be rising in Haiti (1) the country could keep more of its skilled workers (1) • larger labour force / more workers (1) higher total demand (1) increase GDP / increase economic growth / increase productive potential (1) increase living standards (1) increase exports (1) • rise in the numbers employed in Haiti could increase tax revenue (1) may enable more spending on e.g. education (1) • fewer parents may leave behind dependent relatives (1) reduce burden on the government (1) • jobs could be found in other countries (1) Award up to 4 marks for why it might not: • wages may be higher in Chile (1) fewer emigrant workers may send money home (1) living standards may be lower (1) lower spending (1) • less money coming into the country (1) may increase a current account deficit (1) • job opportunities may be higher in Chile (1) unemployment may rise in Haiti (1) • if unemployment rises in Haiti, cost of unemployment benefits may rise (1) opportunity cost / higher taxation (1) • opportunities to gain new skills may be reduced (1) these skills could be brought back into the country (1) 6 For an approach which discusses whether or not the Haitian economy benefits from its people working in Chile, award a maximum of 3 marks. 1(h) • may reduce pressure to invest / spend on capital equipment (1) reduce advances in technology / reduce increases in efficiency / productivity (1) • may increase overcrowding / overpopulation (1) increase external costs / pollution (1) pressure on resources (1).

Read the source material carefully before answering Question 1. Source Material: Morocco’s blue economy Morocco fact file 2017 GDP $109 billion Contribution of fishing industry to GDP 2% Population 35.74 million Continent Africa The World Bank defines a ‘blue economy’ as an economy which uses ocean resources sustainably for economic growth and creates employment to improve the livelihoods of its people. Making full use of the blue economy may reduce the level of poverty among fishermen. Many fishermen globally still live in poverty due to low wages and seasonal and structural unemployment. Morocco is the leading supplier of fish in Africa. Despite the length of the Moroccan coastline, the fishing industry currently makes a very small contribution to Morocco’s GDP. The government, therefore, wants to further increase the size of the fishing industry. Policy measures, such as subsidies to fishermen, could help Moroccan fishermen increase productivity and reduce competition from abroad. The United Nations’ Food and Agricultural Organisation (FAO) forecasts that Moroccan fisheries’ output could rise to nearly 2 million tonnes of fish per year by 2030. The global demand for fish is also on a steep upward trend as more people see the benefits of eating fish rather than meat. Such increases could help reduce the deficit on Morocco’s current account of its balance of payments. Increased dependence on the primary sector may not improve living standards in Morocco because some other countries who have done the same have had disappointing outcomes. Fig. 1.1 shows the GDP per head ($) and percentage (%) contribution of the primary sector to GDP of selected countries. 0% 0 10 000 20 000 30 000 40 000 50 000 60 000 5% 10% 15% % Contribution of primary sector to GDP GDP per head ($) 20% 25% Australia Australia Germany Germany South Korea South Korea Bulgaria Bulgaria Malaysia Malaysia Morocco Morocco India India Pakistan Pakistan Fig. 1.1 GDP per head ($) and % contribution of primary sector to GDP of selected countries Environmentalists worry that there is no proper regulation of fishing in Morocco. If overfishing occurs, fish stocks would be reduced for future generations. However, if fish stocks are maintained, the economy can continue its high economic growth rate. At a time when African countries are reducing trade protection, a sustainable fishing industry could be very positive for Morocco’s future. Answer all parts of Question 1. Refer to the source material in your answers. 1 (a) Calculate, in $s, the contribution of the fishing industry to Morocco’s GDP in 2017. [1] (b) Identify two macroeconomic aims, other than balance of payments stability, that the Moroccan government could achieve through the blue economy. [2] (c) Explain why an increase in the global demand for fish could reduce a deficit in Morocco’s current account of its balance of payment. [2] (d) Explain two causes of poverty amongst fishermen. [4] (e) Analyse whether GDP per head always increases when the percentage (%) contribution of the primary sector increases. [4] (f) Analyse how regulation of fishing could ensure economic growth is sustained for future generations. [5] (g) Discuss whether or not subsidies to fishermen could help the Moroccan economy. [6] (h) Discuss whether or not a reduction in trade protection by other African countries would be beneficial for Morocco. [6]

1(a) Calculate, in $s, the contribution of the fishing industry to Morocco’s GDP in 2017. $2.18 billion / $2 180 000 000 1 Accept 2.2 bn. $ sign not essential. 1(b) Identify two macroeconomic aims, other than balance of payments stability, that the Moroccan government could achieve through the Blue Economy. • Economic growth/sustainable economic growth/development/output • Create employment/ lower unemployment/ full employment • Reduce poverty • Improve livelihoods / improve living standards / improve quality of life 2 1(c) Explain why an increase in the global demand for fish could reduce a deficit in Morocco’s current account of its balance of payment. Logical explanation which might include: Increase in global demand could lead to an increase in demand for Moroccan fish / more sales of Moroccan fish / increase supply of Moroccan fish (1) increasing exports (1) creating an inflow of money / raising export revenue (1) improve trade in goods balance/trade balance (1) balance out imports / exports may now equal imports / reduce gap between exports and imports (1). 2 1(d) Explain two causes of poverty amongst fishermen. Logical explanation which might include: Low wages (1) cannot afford necessities (1) such as food and proper housing (1) high supply / low demand for fishermen (1). Structural unemployment (1) fishermen might not have the skills to take up other jobs (1) after the decline in the fishing industry in their area (1). Seasonal unemployment (1) may not be possible to catch fish throughout the year (1) instability of income (1). 4 One mark for each cause identified and one mark for each explanation. One mark for unemployment. 1(e) Analyse whether GDP per head always increases when the percentage (%) contribution of the primary sector increases. Coherent analysis which might include: Overview No / not always (1) if % contribution of the primary sector increases, GDP per head is lower (1). Supporting evidence e.g. Pakistan/India/Morocco have a high % contribution and low GDP per head (1), Germany has the lowest % contribution but second highest GDP per head (1) comparison e.g. Germany has a higher GDP per head than India but a smaller contribution from the primary sector (1). Exception There is an exception/on the other hand (1) e.g. Australia – higher % contribution than Germany, but higher GDP per head or e.g. Malaysia – higher % contribution than Bulgaria, but higher GDP (1). Comments High-income countries tend to have more resources concentrated in the secondary and tertiary sectors/tertiary sector (1) incomes tend to be higher in the secondary and tertiary sectors / lower in the primary sector (1). 4 1(f) Analyse how regulation of fishing could ensure economic growth is sustained for future generations. Coherent analysis which might include: Regulation could prevent people from overfishing (1) regulation is backed up by law / fines may be imposed (1) gives time for fish to breed / recover form overfishing (1) so that future generations will still have access to fish stock / maintain fish stocks (1) this means that future generations will still be able to generate revenue from fishing (1) which could lead to increased or sustained investment/consumption/exports (1) ensuring high total demand (1) Regulation on fishing could also help coastal tourism (1) protect the environment (1) increase revenue from tourism (1) as people visit areas of natural beauty (1). (5) Also allow an approach based on how overfishing may threaten sustainable economic growth. 1(g) Discuss whether or not subsidies to fishermen could help the Moroccan economy. Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it could, which might include: • subsidies will decrease cost of production (1) and enable Moroccan fishermen to use better technology / capital / / equipment / enable them to take advantage of economies of scale / engage in research & development (1) • increase their productivity (1) lead to an increase in supply / output (1) price of Moroccan fish would decrease (1) this will increase competitiveness of Moroccan fishermen (1) increase demand (1) create jobs / increase employment / reduce unemployment (1) increase exports / reduce imports (1) improve the current account balance (1). • increase revenues/income of fishermen (1) investments / consumption (1) increase total demand (1) leading to economic growth (1). Up to 4 marks how subsidies to fisherman could not help the Moroccan economy: • opportunity cost for the government (1) may result in a budget deficit (1) less spending on education / healthcare (1) decrease overall productivity of the economy (1) less economic growth (1). • subsidies may lead to complacency (1) may become depended on subsidies (1) fishermen may not use the subsidies efficiently (1) may result in overfishing (1) may increase pollution / external costs (1). • Fishing industry only contributes 2% of GDP (1) even if it expands may not increase the country’s output significantly (1). • Competitiveness may not increase (1) prices might not decrease (1) other governments may subsidise their fishermen (1). 6 Apply this example to all questions with the command word DISCUSS (1g, 1h, 2d, 3d, 4d and 5d) Each point may be credited only once, on either side of an argument, but separate development as to how/why the outcome may differ is rewarded. Generic example Tax revenue may decrease 1 because of reason e.g. incomes may be lower. 1 Tax revenue may increase because incomes may be higher i.e. reverse of a previous argument. 0 Tax revenue may increase because of a different reason i.e. not the reverse of a previous argument e.g. government spending on subsidies may stimulate the economy more than spending on education. 1 1(h) Discuss whether or not a reduction in trade protection by other African countries would be beneficial for Morocco. Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might be beneficial, which might include: • less protectionism will decrease the price of Moroccan exports (1) increase exports (1) improve current account balance (1) • less protectionism will allow Morocco to specialise more / enable it to concentrate on what it is best at producing (1) • demand for labour is derived demand (1), demand for domestic workers will increase (1) therefore unemployment decreases (1) income increases / poverty decreases (1) consumption of good and services can increase (1) more total demand (1) economic growth (1) • inflation may fall (1) lower cost of imported raw materials/imported capital goods (1). Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might not be beneficial, which might include: • decreased protection might lead to other countries products decreasing in price as well (1), Moroccan goods may decrease in competitiveness (1) decrease the demand for Moroccan goods (1) increase in imports (1) • infant/sunrise industries may go out of business (1) unable to compete as not able to take full advantage of economies of scale (1) • sunset/declining industries may go out of business (1) likely to have high costs of production (1) • decrease the demand for workers (1) as less is produced (1) unemployment increases (1) less income (1) consumption of goods and services decrease (1) decreased total demand (1) less economic growth (1). 6

2 A government reduces social security spending by $10 bn in order to increase defence spending by $10 bn. What is this an example of? A expansionary fiscal policy B market forces C price stability D reallocation of resources

Answer: D To earn the mark, a student must recognize that shifting funds from social security to defense spending is an example of reallocating resources.

Cambridge IGCSE Economics · 0455

IGCSE Economics (0455) Government and the macroeconomy past paper questions

These questions cover government aims, fiscal and monetary policy, inflation, and unemployment.

552 free questions from 2016–2021, each with its marking scheme. Open the full topical bank to filter by subtopic, paper, and year.

Government and the macroeconomy in IGCSE Economics 0455 exams, 2020–2025

Across 2020–2025, Government and the macroeconomy accounted for 548 questions worth 3,973 marks in Cambridge IGCSE Economics (0455) papers.

By year
Year	Questions	Marks
2020	98	716
2021	91	635
2022	101	607
2023	88	680
2024	80	691
2025	90	644

Most-tested subtopics

4.5 Economic growth1500 marks
4.6 Employment and unemployment1220 marks
4.2 Fiscal policy1000 marks

Appears in

Paper 1 · 388 qs
Paper 2 · 160 qs

All most-tested Economics topics

2021 Feb/Mar · Paper 2 · Q1 · 30 marks
Marking scheme
Get Steven’s plain-English explanation
2021 May/Jun · Paper 2 · Q1 · 30 marks
Marking scheme
Get Steven’s plain-English explanation
2021 May/Jun · Paper 2 · Q1 · 30 marks
Marking scheme
Get Steven’s plain-English explanation
2021 May/Jun · Paper 2 · Q1 · 30 marks
Marking scheme
Get Steven’s plain-English explanation
2021 Feb/Mar · Paper 1 · Q2 · 1 mark
Marking scheme
Mark scheme — 2021 Paper 1 Q2
Answer: D
Get Steven’s plain-English explanation